A Technical Guide – Part One

A Technical Guide – Part One

At first glance, 3D printing can seem deceptively simple. You load a file, press print, and a physical object appears. But anyone who has tried to use a printed part in the real world quickly learns that how a part is printed matters just as much as what is printed. Strength, durability, and reliability are all shaped by a small number of key decisions made before the print ever begins.

Among the most important of these decisions are layer height, infill, and print orientation. These settings control how material is laid down, how layers bond together, and how forces travel through the finished part. Understanding how they interact is what separates fragile display pieces from robust, functional components.

This guide is written for readers who want to move beyond beginner assumptions and start thinking like designers and engineers people who want their prints not just to look good, but to work properly.


What Layer Height Really Means

Layer height describes how thick each individual printed layer is. In most desktop FDM printers, this value is measured in millimetres and typically falls somewhere between 0.12 mm and 0.28 mm. While it’s often described as a “quality setting”, layer height influences far more than surface finish.

Smaller layer heights create smoother surfaces and finer detail because the steps between layers are less visible. This is why detailed models and visual parts often use thinner layers. Larger layer heights, on the other hand, reduce print time and can actually improve layer bonding when temperature and flow are set correctly.

It’s important to challenge a common misconception here: thinner layers do not automatically make stronger parts. In fact, thicker layers can sometimes produce stronger results because there is more molten material available to bond each layer together.

With a standard 0.4 mm nozzle, most reliable results are achieved when layer height stays between roughly 25% and 75% of the nozzle diameter. That places the practical range between about 0.16 mm and 0.28 mm. Outside this range, layer bonding and extrusion consistency begin to suffer.


How Layer Height Influences Strength

To understand strength in 3D printing, you need to understand anisotropy. This simply means that printed parts are not equally strong in all directions. The weakest direction is almost always between layers, along the vertical (Z) axis.

Layer height plays a direct role here. Very thin layers increase the number of thermal cycles during a print, which can introduce subtle weaknesses between layers. Thicker layers reduce the total number of layer interfaces and, when printed at the correct temperature, allow stronger fusion between layers.

This does not mean “thicker is always better”, but it does mean that chasing ultra-fine layers for strength is often counterproductive. Strength comes from good bonding, not just visual smoothness.


Understanding Infill from the Inside Out

Infill controls how much material exists inside the part. Rather than printing objects completely solid, most prints use an internal structure to support the outer walls. This saves material, reduces print time, and—when done correctly—maintains strength.

Infill is usually expressed as a percentage, but it’s important not to think of it as a direct measure of strength. A part printed at 30% infill is not “half as strong” as one printed at 60%. In practice, strength increases rapidly at first and then levels off.

For many functional parts, infill values between 20% and 30% are more than sufficient. Higher infill levels add weight and time but often provide diminishing returns unless the part is under extreme load.


Why Infill Pattern Matters

Infill is not just about quantity; it’s also about structure. Different infill patterns distribute forces in different ways.

Patterns such as gyroid and cubic are popular in functional printing because they distribute stress evenly in multiple directions. This makes them well suited for parts that experience complex or unpredictable loads. Simpler patterns like grid print quickly, but they tend to perform poorly under twisting or bending forces.

For most real-world applications, a gyroid or cubic infill at a moderate density offers the best balance between strength, material use, and print time.


Why Wall Thickness Often Matters More Than Infill

One of the most important lessons in functional 3D printing is that outer walls do far more work than internal infill. Walls resist bending, impact, and surface damage, while infill mainly supports the walls from collapsing inward.

A useful rule of thumb is this: adding one extra wall often improves strength more than increasing infill by 20%. This surprises many beginners, but it reflects how forces actually move through printed parts.

For most functional prints, using three to five walls combined with moderate infill produces parts that are both strong and efficient. Increasing the number of top and bottom layers further improves durability, especially for parts under compression or impact.


Print Orientation: Strength Without Changing Settings

Print orientation is one of the most powerful—and most overlooked—tools in strength optimisation. Because layer bonding is weakest between layers, parts are strongest when forces act along the layers rather than across them.

A bracket printed flat can support far more load than the same bracket printed upright. Holes and threads tend to perform better when printed horizontally. Long beams are far stronger when laid flat rather than standing vertically.

In many cases, simply rotating a part in the slicer improves strength more than changing any numerical setting.


Temperature, Cooling, and Layer Bonding

Layer bonding depends heavily on thermal behaviour. If plastic cools too quickly, layers do not fuse properly. If it is printed too cold, the material becomes brittle and weak.

Functional parts often benefit from slightly higher extrusion temperatures and reduced cooling. This allows layers to remain molten long enough to bond effectively. Materials such as PETG, ABS, and ASA are particularly sensitive to cooling, and excessive fan use can dramatically reduce strength.

Even PLA, often printed with high cooling for visual quality, can produce stronger parts when fan speeds are reduced.


Material Choice and Mechanical Behaviour

No amount of tuning can compensate for the wrong material. PLA is stiff and dimensionally accurate, but it is brittle and prone to creep. PETG is tougher and more forgiving. ABS and ASA tolerate heat and impact far better. Nylon offers exceptional strength and fatigue resistance but demands careful moisture control.

Material choice often has a greater impact on real-world performance than infill percentage or layer height. Choosing correctly at this stage prevents failure later.


Knowing When Professional Printing Makes Sense

Some designs demand consistency, precision, and material control that are difficult to achieve reliably on home machines. Parts that must fit accurately, perform under load, or be produced repeatedly benefit from professional printing workflows.

At BritForge3D, prints are optimised for mechanical performance using calibrated machines, proven material profiles, and controlled environments. The goal is not just to make parts look good, but to make them work as intended—every time.

If your part needs to function reliably, not just print successfully, professional support can make all the difference.


Final Thoughts

Understanding layer height, infill, and print orientation changes the way you approach 3D printing. Instead of guessing, you begin making informed decisions that save time, reduce material waste, and dramatically improve performance.

These principles apply whether you are printing at home or working with a professional service. Once mastered, they form the foundation for every successful functional print.

In the next technical guide, we will explore tolerances, shrinkage, and dimensional accuracy—essential knowledge for parts that must fit together precisely.

Guide 1 Summary – The Basics of 3D Printing

This guide introduced the fundamental process behind 3D printing, from digital model to finished physical part. By understanding how slicing, layer formation, and material deposition work together, you can begin to see why certain print decisions matter more than others.

Rather than treating 3D printing as a black box, this guide encourages you to think of it as a controlled manufacturing process. Once you understand how layers are created and bonded, settings such as orientation, material choice, and strength optimisation start to make sense.

In the next guide, we build on this foundation by exploring how layer height, infill, and internal structure influence the strength and reliability of printed parts.

A Technical Guide – Part Two

Understanding Tolerances in 3D Printing

One of the most important concepts to understand in 3D printing is that printed parts are never exact copies of their digital designs. This can be surprising at first, especially for people coming from traditional manufacturing or CAD backgrounds. On screen, a model appears perfect and precise. In reality, the printed result is always an approximation — and that’s completely normal.

The way we manage this approximation is through tolerances. A tolerance is simply an accepted range of variation between parts that are meant to fit together. Rather than expecting absolute accuracy, designers allow for small differences so components can still assemble and function correctly.

In traditional manufacturing methods such as machining, tolerances can be extremely tight because material is removed in a controlled, predictable way. In 3D printing, parts are built layer by layer from molten plastic. This introduces more variability, which means tolerances must be wider to remain realistic and reliable.

Several factors contribute to this variation. Each layer is placed individually, material flow can vary slightly from one moment to the next, plastic contracts as it cools, and even a well-maintained machine has mechanical limits. Because of this, designing without tolerance allowances is one of the most common causes of failed assemblies in 3D printing.

For most FDM printers, a realistic expectation is accuracy within about two tenths of a millimetre for general-purpose parts. Well-tuned machines can sometimes achieve tighter results, but designing around ideal conditions rather than typical ones often leads to frustration. Good design is about predictability, not perfection.


Why Holes Almost Always Print Smaller

A classic example of tolerance issues appears with holes. If you design a hole at a specific diameter, it will almost always print slightly smaller than expected. This behaviour is not a printer fault — it’s a natural outcome of the printing process.

As the nozzle moves in a circular path, molten plastic tends to curve inward rather than forming a perfect circle. Layer stacking adds a stepped edge to what should be a smooth surface, and cooling causes the material to contract slightly. When these effects combine, the final hole ends up undersized.

Because this behaviour is consistent, it can be designed around. A practical approach is to increase hole diameters in the design stage, typically by two to four tenths of a millimetre. For example, a hole intended for a 5 mm bolt may be designed closer to 5.3 or 5.4 mm to ensure reliable fit after printing.

For applications where precision really matters, post-processing is often the best solution. Drilling or reaming printed holes removes variability and produces clean, accurate results that are difficult to achieve through printing alone.


Shrinkage: Why Parts Change Size as They Cool

Shrinkage is another unavoidable aspect of 3D printing. When plastic is heated and then allowed to cool, it contracts. Different materials shrink at different rates, which is why the same design can behave very differently depending on the filament used.

PLA is one of the most dimensionally stable materials and tends to shrink very little, which is why it prints so predictably. PETG shrinks slightly more but compensates by being more flexible, reducing the risk of cracking. ABS, ASA, and nylon shrink significantly more and are far more sensitive to cooling conditions, which is why enclosures and controlled environments are often required.

Shrinkage affects more than just overall size. It influences flatness, causes warping, and distorts holes and mating surfaces. This is why material choice plays such a critical role in dimensional accuracy. Choosing the wrong material can introduce accuracy issues that no amount of slicer tuning will fully correct.


How Print Orientation Affects Accuracy

Accuracy in 3D printing is not uniform in all directions. The printer controls movement in the horizontal directions using motors and belts, which are generally very precise. Vertical movement, however, is governed by layer height, which limits resolution in that direction.

As a result, parts tend to be more accurate in the horizontal plane than in the vertical one. Vertical holes are often less accurate than horizontal holes. Tall, thin parts can drift slightly as layers accumulate, and changes in layer height directly affect vertical resolution.

For parts where accuracy is critical, orienting important surfaces in the horizontal plane often produces better results. This does not eliminate the need for tolerances, but it does reduce variability.


Layer Height and Dimensional Control

Layer height plays an important role in how accurately features are reproduced, particularly in the vertical direction. Smaller layer heights improve resolution and produce smoother mating surfaces, while larger layer heights exaggerate the stepped nature of the print.

For parts where fit matters, consistency is more important than ultra-fine detail. Moderate layer heights tend to produce more predictable results, especially when combined with sufficient top and bottom layers. Adaptive layer height can be useful, but only after careful testing, as it introduces additional variability.


Calibration: The Hidden Foundation of Accuracy

No amount of clever design can compensate for a poorly calibrated printer. Dimensional accuracy begins with consistent extrusion, stable motion, and reliable bed positioning.

Extrusion accuracy ensures that the correct amount of material is deposited. Belt tension affects positional accuracy in the horizontal plane. Bed leveling and Z-offset determine how accurately the first layer sets the foundation for the entire print. Advanced features such as pressure advance help manage material flow during acceleration and deceleration.

At BritForge3D, printers are routinely calibrated and verified to ensure that parts behave predictably across multiple prints. This consistency is essential for professional prototyping and repeat production.


Designing for Fit: Clearance as a Design Tool

Rather than trying to eliminate variation, experienced designers use clearance intentionally. Clearance is the space between mating parts that allows for assembly after printing.

Loose fits allow parts to move freely. Sliding fits enable controlled movement. Snug fits hold parts in place without force. Press fits require testing and careful iteration. These categories are not fixed rules, but starting points that must be validated through prototypes.

Fit-critical parts should always be tested before final production. Small changes in clearance can dramatically change how a part behaves.


Threads, Inserts, and Reliable Fastening

Printed threads can work, but they have limitations. Coarse threads perform better than fine ones, and orientation matters greatly for strength. For assemblies that will be taken apart repeatedly, printed threads are rarely the best solution.

Heat-set inserts provide a far more durable alternative. Installed correctly, they create strong metal threads within printed parts, allowing repeated assembly without wear. Designing for inserts requires careful attention to hole size and installation temperature, but the improvement in reliability is significant.


When Precision Truly Matters

Some projects demand tighter control than most home printers can reliably provide. Mechanical assemblies, snap-fit enclosures, replacement parts, and engineering prototypes often fall into this category.

This is where a professional print service adds real value. At BritForge3D, tolerances are adjusted per material, critical components are test-fit, and print orientation is chosen specifically to maximise accuracy. The result is consistent, dependable production for customers across the UK.


Final Thoughts

Dimensional accuracy in 3D printing is not about achieving perfection. It is about achieving predictability. Once you understand how tolerances, shrinkage, orientation, and calibration interact, you can design parts that fit first time and perform exactly as intended.

In the next technical guide, we will explore heat resistance, load, and long-term durability — essential knowledge for parts designed to survive real-world use.

Guide 2 Summary – Layer Height, Infill, and Strength

In this guide, we explored how strength in 3D printing is created internally rather than through surface appearance alone. You learned why thicker walls often matter more than high infill, why thinner layers are not always stronger, and how print orientation can dramatically affect performance.

The key takeaway is that strength comes from balance. Smart combinations of layer height, wall thickness, infill, and orientation produce better results than extreme settings in any single area.

The next guide focuses on one of the most common challenges in functional printing: understanding tolerances, shrinkage, and why parts do not always fit together as expected.

A Beginner’s Guide to 3D Printing

What You Need to Know

If you’re new to 3D printing, you’re not alone it’s one of the most exciting and accessible manufacturing technologies of the 21st century. In this beginner-friendly guide from BritForge 3D, we’ll walk you through the basics of how it works, the materials used, common applications, and how to get started quickly without needing your own printer!

What Is 3D Printing?

3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, is the process of creating a physical object from a digital model by building it up layer by layer. Unlike traditional subtractive methods (cutting, drilling), 3D printing adds material only where it’s needed making it cost-effective and precise.

How Does It Work?

  1. Design: Create or download a 3D model (usually in STL format).
  2. Slice: The model is sliced into layers using slicing software.
  3. Print: The printer lays down each layer until the object is complete.

Popular 3D Printing Methods

  • FDM (Fused Deposition Modelling): Uses thermoplastic filament. Great for strong, functional parts.
  • SLA/DLP (Resin Printing): Uses liquid resin cured by light. Best for ultra-fine details and smooth finishes.

What Materials Are Used?

Beginner-friendly 3D prints typically use:

  • PLA: Easy to print, biodegradable, great for models and prototypes.
  • PETG: Strong and durable, ideal for functional parts.
  • Resin: High detail, best for miniatures or jewellery.

Common Uses of 3D Printing

  • Prototyping and product development
  • Custom tools, brackets, and mechanical parts
  • Educational models and STEM teaching
  • Hobbyist projects and tabletop miniatures

Why You Don’t Need Your Own 3D Printer

While home printers are popular, you don’t need to buy or maintain one yourself. Services like BritForge 3D let you upload a file, choose materials, and have a professional-quality part delivered to your door no technical knowledge required.

Tips for 3D Printing Beginners

  • Start with simple, solid models without thin walls or complex overhangs
  • Use free libraries like Thingiverse or Printables
  • Check model scale (usually in mm)
  • Consider the part’s purpose before choosing a material

How BritForge 3D Can Help

We work with both beginners and professionals to bring ideas to life. Whether you’re printing your first design or need guidance choosing a material, our team is here to help. Just upload your file or send us a message and we’ll take care of the rest.

Conclusion

3D printing is transforming how we design and make things. As a beginner, you’re entering a world of endless creativity and customisation. With the right guidance and support, anyone can turn a digital idea into a physical object and BritForge 3D is here to help you every step of the way.

A Technical Guide – Part Three

Heat Resistance, Load, and Long-Term Durability in 3D Printed Parts

A common assumption in 3D printing is that if a part feels strong when it comes off the printer, it will remain strong in use. In reality, many printed parts fail not because they were overloaded, but because they were exposed to heat or stress over time. Understanding durability means thinking beyond initial strength and considering how materials behave in real-world conditions.

Heat plays a critical role in plastic performance. Most plastics do not need to reach their melting point to fail. Instead, they gradually soften as they approach their heat deflection temperature. At this point, a part may still look intact but can no longer support load without deforming.

PLA is a good example. While it is stiff and strong at room temperature, it softens at relatively low heat. This is why PLA parts often warp inside cars, near electronics, or in warm environments. The part has not melted; it has simply lost its ability to resist deformation.

Load introduces another dimension to durability. When a part carries weight continuously, it experiences stress even if that stress is well below its breaking strength. Over time, this can lead to creep, which is slow, permanent deformation. PLA is particularly prone to creep, which is why it is unsuitable for long-term load-bearing parts.

PETG behaves differently. Its slight flexibility allows it to absorb stress rather than concentrating it in one place. This makes PETG far more resistant to cracking and long-term deformation under moderate loads. However, this flexibility can also be a disadvantage where rigidity is required.

ABS and ASA are designed for harsher conditions. They maintain their shape at higher temperatures and resist impact better than PLA or PETG. ASA adds UV resistance, making it suitable for outdoor use where sunlight would otherwise degrade the material.

Nylon takes durability further still. It excels under repeated stress, vibration, and impact. Nylon parts often bend rather than break, making them ideal for mechanical components. However, nylon’s performance depends heavily on moisture control, as absorbed water changes its mechanical behaviour.

Durability is also influenced by geometry. Sharp corners concentrate stress, while smooth transitions distribute it. Thin sections heat and cool faster than thick ones, which can introduce internal stress. These factors all affect how a part ages over time.

Print orientation plays a major role as well. Loads applied across layer lines exploit the weakest direction in FDM printing. Orienting parts so that stress runs along the layers dramatically improves durability without changing material or settings.

Environmental exposure must also be considered. UV light, moisture, chemicals, and temperature cycling all degrade plastics differently. A part designed for indoor use may fail quickly outdoors if material choice is not adjusted.

Durability, therefore, is not a single property. It is the result of material choice, geometry, orientation, and environment working together. Ignoring any one of these factors invites failure.

Professional printing workflows consider durability from the start. At BritForge3D, parts are evaluated not just for print success, but for how they will perform weeks, months, and years after installation.

Understanding long-term behaviour allows designers to avoid surprises and create parts that remain reliable throughout their service life.

Guide 3 Summary – Tolerances and Dimensional Accuracy

This guide explained why printed parts are never exact replicas of their digital designs and why this is not a flaw, but a characteristic of the process. By understanding tolerances, shrinkage, and orientation-related accuracy, you can design parts that fit reliably instead of relying on trial and error.

You learned that dimensional accuracy is about predictability, not perfection. Once variation is understood and planned for, assembly issues become far less common.

In the next guide, we move beyond fit and focus on how printed parts behave over time, exploring heat resistance, load, and long-term durability.

What Makes a 3D Model ‘Printable’?

A Beginner’s Guide

Not every 3D model is ready for the printer. Whether you download it from Thingiverse or model it yourself, here’s what to check before printing.

1. Watertight (Manifold) Geometry

Your model must be a single, closed mesh with no gaps or loose surfaces.

2. No Non-Manifold Edges

These confusing edges can’t exist in the real world and will confuse the slicer.

3. Scaled Correctly

Make sure the dimensions make sense especially if your file was exported in inches but imported in millimetres!

4. Clean Mesh

Use tools like Netfabb or Meshmixer to clean and repair geometry.

Still unsure? Upload your file to BritForge3D.co.uk and we’ll check it for free before printing.

Print Orientation, Anisotropy, and Structural Optimisation

3D printed parts are anisotropic, meaning their strength varies depending on direction. Understanding this concept is critical for engineering-grade parts.

What Is Anisotropy?

Unlike injection-moulded parts, 3D prints have directional strength:

  • X/Y plane: strongest
  • Z axis: weakest (layer adhesion)

Ignoring anisotropy leads to unexpected failures.

Designing With the Load Path

Always align your print so the load path runs parallel to layers, not across them.

Examples:

  • Brackets should lie flat
  • Hooks should print sideways
  • Shafts should not be printed upright

Using Geometry to Improve Strength

Strength isn’t just about settings geometry matters.

Effective design features:

  • Fillets instead of sharp corners
  • Ribs instead of solid blocks
  • Gradual transitions in thickness
  • Hollow structures with thick walls

These reduce stress concentration and improve performance.

Support vs Strength Trade-Offs

Reorienting for strength sometimes requires more support material.

Tips:

  • Accept supports if strength improves
  • Remove supports carefully to avoid scars
  • Consider splitting and bonding parts

Professional Print Strategy

At BritForge3D, orientation is selected based on:

  • Load direction
  • Surface finish requirements
  • Post-processing needs
  • Material behaviour

Get expert orientation applied automatically when you upload your file.

What File Types Can Be 3D Printed?

A Simple Guide

Before you print, you need the right file format. Not all 3D design files are created equal and some work better than others for printing.

Most Common 3D Printable File Types

  • STL – The most universal format for 3D printing. Widely supported and ideal for simple shapes.
  • OBJ – Includes color and texture data. Best for artistic models or miniatures.
  • 3MF – A modern format with more metadata and better slicing support.

When to Use Each File Type

If you’re designing in Fusion 360, Tinkercad, or Blender, export as STL unless your project requires materials or textures.

Need help converting a file? We’re happy to assist before printing!

A Technical Guide – Part Nine

Understanding 3D Printing File Types: STL, 3MF, OBJ and G-code Explained

When a customer uploads a file for 3D printing, the first question we consider is not how large the part is or what material it requires. The first question is much simpler: what file format are we working with?

File type plays a significant role in print reliability, geometry accuracy, material settings, and even colour information. Many users treat file formats as interchangeable, but they are not. Each format exists for a reason, and choosing the correct one can improve workflow efficiency and reduce print errors.

In this lesson, we will explore the four most common file types used in 3D printing: STL, 3MF, OBJ, and G-code. More importantly, we will examine when to use each one and why.


Why File Format Matters in 3D Printing

A 3D printer does not understand design software files such as SolidWorks, Fusion, or Blender files directly. Instead, those designs must be exported into a format that slicing software can interpret.

The file you export determines:

  • How geometry is stored
  • Whether units are preserved
  • Whether colour and material data are included
  • Whether slicing settings travel with the model
  • How easily the file can be repaired

Using the wrong format can introduce scaling issues, lost metadata, corrupted geometry, or unnecessary workflow steps.

Understanding file formats allows you to control your process rather than react to problems later.


STL – The Industry Standard

The STL file (Standard Tessellation Language or StereoLithography) is the oldest and most widely recognised format in 3D printing.

STL files describe geometry using triangles. Every curved surface is approximated by a mesh of small triangular faces. The smaller and more numerous the triangles, the smoother the surface appears.

However, STL files contain only geometry. They do not store:

  • Units (mm or inches)
  • Colour
  • Material data
  • Print settings

This simplicity is both a strength and a limitation.

Benefits of STL

STL is universally supported. Nearly every slicer, CAD package, and 3D printer workflow accepts STL files. Because the format is simple, files are generally stable and predictable.

For single-material functional parts, STL is often perfectly adequate.

Limitations of STL

Because STL does not store units, scale errors are common. A part designed in millimetres may open as inches in another system.

STL also cannot store multiple bodies intelligently, colour data, or advanced metadata.

For simple prints, STL works well. For more complex workflows, it begins to show its age.


3MF – The Modern Alternative

3MF (3D Manufacturing Format) was developed to solve the limitations of STL.

Unlike STL, 3MF files store:

  • Units
  • Multiple bodies
  • Colour information
  • Material assignments
  • Print settings (when exported from slicers)

This makes 3MF far more powerful for modern workflows.

Why 3MF Is Often Better for 3D Printing

Because 3MF preserves units, scaling errors are eliminated. What you design is what opens in the slicer.

3MF also allows multi-material and multi-colour information to travel with the file. If you are using a multi-material printer, this is critical.

Additionally, some slicers store support placement and slicing profiles inside the 3MF file. This makes collaboration easier because another user can open the file exactly as intended.

When to Choose 3MF

If you are working in a modern slicer and want to preserve configuration, or if you are printing multi-material parts, 3MF is usually the better choice.

For professional workflows, 3MF is increasingly becoming the preferred format.


OBJ – Geometry with Visual Data

OBJ files are commonly used in animation and 3D modelling rather than manufacturing, but they also have applications in 3D printing.

Like STL, OBJ files describe geometry through mesh data. However, OBJ files can also store:

  • Colour data
  • Texture references
  • Surface information

This makes OBJ useful for full-colour printing systems.

When OBJ Makes Sense

If you are printing artistic models, figurines, or textured parts that require colour mapping, OBJ can be valuable.

However, OBJ files can be larger and more complex than STL. They may also include unnecessary data for simple functional prints.

For most engineering parts, OBJ is not required.


G-code – The Machine Instruction File

G-code is very different from STL, 3MF, or OBJ.

While those formats describe geometry, G-code describes movement instructions for the printer.

Once a file is sliced, the slicer converts the model into G-code. This file contains:

  • Exact nozzle movements
  • Extrusion rates
  • Temperature commands
  • Fan speeds
  • Layer heights

G-code is printer-specific. It is generated for a particular machine, with specific settings.

Why You Don’t Share G-code as a Design File

Because G-code contains machine instructions, it is not portable in the same way geometry files are.

A G-code file created for one printer may not work correctly on another due to:

  • Different bed sizes
  • Firmware differences
  • Extruder configurations
  • Temperature limits

For this reason, when sending a file to a professional 3D printing service, you should always send geometry files (STL or 3MF), not G-code.


Choosing the Right File Type

So how do you decide?

If you are printing a simple single-material part and need universal compatibility, STL is safe and reliable.

If you want to preserve units, materials, and advanced data, 3MF is the superior modern option.

If you are working with colour textures or artistic models, OBJ may be appropriate.

If you are printing directly from your own slicer to your own machine, G-code is the final production file — but not something to share externally.


Professional Workflow Recommendation

At BritForge3D, we recommend:

  • 3MF for most modern workflows
  • STL for compatibility and simple parts
  • Avoid sending G-code unless specifically requested

We re-slice all files to ensure compatibility with calibrated machines and optimised material profiles.

Sending geometry files instead of machine code allows us to ensure print strength, dimensional accuracy, and material suitability.


Common Mistakes to Avoid

One of the most common mistakes is exporting STL with extremely low mesh resolution. This results in visible flat facets on curved surfaces.

Another mistake is forgetting to check units before export.

Finally, some users send G-code assuming it guarantees identical results. In reality, it can introduce compatibility risks.


Final Thoughts

Understanding file formats is not just about software preference. It is about workflow control.

Choosing the correct file format improves reliability, reduces errors, and supports better collaboration between designers and print services.

As 3D printing evolves, 3MF is increasingly replacing STL for professional workflows. However, STL remains deeply embedded in the ecosystem.

In the next guide, we will explore how to prepare files properly before upload — including mesh repair, manifold checks, and design validation.


Choose the Right Material for Your 3D Print

One of the most important decisions you’ll make when starting a 3D printing project is choosing the right material. Whether you’re printing a prototype, a mechanical part, or a piece of art, the filament or resin you choose can affect the strength, appearance, and success of your final product.

Why Material Choice Matters in 3D Printing

Every material used in 3D printing has its own set of properties from strength and flexibility to heat resistance and surface finish. Choosing the wrong material can lead to failed prints, brittle parts, or unnecessary expense. Understanding the differences between materials helps ensure you get the best results based on your application.

Overview of Common 3D Printing Materials

  • PLA (Polylactic Acid): Easy to print and biodegradable. Ideal for general-purpose prints and prototypes.
  • PETG (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol): Stronger and more durable than PLA. Great for functional parts.
  • ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene): Impact-resistant and heat-tolerant. Used in engineering and manufacturing.
  • TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane): Flexible and rubber-like. Suitable for phone cases, seals, and wearables.

When to Choose PLA

PLA is perfect for beginners or those creating visual models. It’s affordable, available in a wide range of colours, and prints without warping. However, it’s not the best choice for parts exposed to high heat or mechanical stress.

When to Choose PETG

PETG is ideal for durable parts that need to resist stress or moisture. It offers a good balance between strength and flexibility and is commonly used in mechanical assemblies, tool handles, and enclosures. PETG also has a glossy finish and better UV resistance than PLA.

When to Choose ABS

ABS is known for its high durability and heat resistance. It’s used in automotive components, functional prototypes, and casings. However, it requires a heated print bed and enclosed chamber to prevent warping, and it emits fumes, so good ventilation is essential.

When to Choose TPU or Specialty Filaments

TPU is a flexible filament often used for protective gear, phone cases, and gaskets. Specialty filaments such as carbon fibre, wood-infused, or glow-in-the-dark PLA offer additional features but may require tuning print settings or a hardened nozzle.

Material Comparison Table

MaterialStrengthFlexibilityPrint DifficultyUse Case
PLAModerateLowEasyPrototypes, models
PETGHighModerateMediumFunctional parts
ABSHighLowDifficultEngineering, industrial
TPUModerateHighMediumFlexible parts

Tips for Choosing the Right Material

  • Match material strength and durability to the intended use
  • Consider the environment heat, moisture, UV exposure
  • Think about flexibility or rigidity as needed
  • Balance aesthetics vs. functionality
  • Ask for advice if unsure experienced printers can help

How BritForge 3D Can Help

At BritForge 3D, we work with a wide range of materials to suit every project. Whether you’re printing a quick prototype or a batch of custom parts, we help you select the right filament based on your goals, budget, and design needs.

Our experts are happy to recommend the best option for your file. Simply upload your model or contact us for a free consultation.

Conclusion

Choosing the right material is critical to the success of your 3D print. With options like PLA, PETG, ABS, and TPU, there’s a perfect filament for every job and BritForge 3D is here to help you find it. Let us bring your ideas to life with the right balance of strength, detail, and value.

A Technical Guide – Part Ten

Why Doesn’t My 3D Scanner Capture Detail as Small as 0.02 mm?

One of the most common questions people ask after purchasing or using a 3D scanner is why the scanner does not capture detail as precisely as the specification suggests. Many scanners advertise resolutions such as 0.02 mm, yet when scanning real-world objects the captured model appears far less detailed.

This can be confusing and sometimes disappointing, especially for users expecting extremely fine detail. However, the answer usually lies not in the scanner being faulty, but in how scanner specifications, resolution, accuracy, and real-world conditions actually work.

Understanding these factors helps you get the best results from your scanner and avoid unrealistic expectations.


Resolution vs Accuracy – The First Source of Confusion

When a scanner advertises a resolution of 0.02 mm, this does not mean it can reliably measure every feature at that size.

In most scanners, resolution refers to the smallest point spacing the scanner can record, not the true measurement accuracy.

These are two very different things.

Resolution describes the density of points in the captured mesh.
Accuracy describes how close those points are to the true dimensions of the object.

For example, a scanner may generate points every 0.02 mm, but the true dimensional accuracy may only be ±0.05 mm or ±0.1 mm depending on the scanning conditions.

This distinction explains why extremely fine features may not appear clearly even though the specification seems capable of capturing them.


Surface Properties of the Object

Another major factor affecting scan detail is the surface of the object being scanned.

3D scanners rely on reflected light or structured light patterns to detect geometry. Certain surface types interfere with this process.

Highly reflective surfaces can scatter the projected light pattern, making it difficult for the scanner to calculate depth accurately. Similarly, very dark or matte surfaces may absorb too much light, reducing contrast.

Transparent or glossy materials are particularly challenging because the scanner may detect reflections rather than the actual surface.

This is why professional scanning workflows often use temporary scanning sprays to create a uniform matte surface that improves data capture.


Distance from the Scanner

3D scanners operate within an optimal working distance. If the object is too close or too far away, the scanner cannot resolve small details properly.

Most scanners have a focus range or optimal capture distance, and fine detail is only captured when the object sits within this range.

If the scanner is held too far away, point density decreases and small features are lost. If it is too close, the scanner may struggle to maintain tracking or capture complete geometry.

Maintaining a consistent scanning distance is therefore critical for achieving the best resolution.


Movement and Tracking Stability

Handheld scanners rely on stable tracking of the object’s surface while scanning. If tracking is lost or unstable, the software may smooth or average data during reconstruction.

This smoothing can remove small details that technically fall within the scanner’s resolution.

Even small hand movements or vibrations can affect point alignment. Professional scanning often uses tripods, turntables, or fixed scanning rigs to minimise movement and maximise accuracy.


Lighting Conditions

Ambient lighting also influences scan quality.

Strong sunlight or bright studio lighting can interfere with structured light patterns used by many scanners. Excessive ambient light reduces contrast between projected patterns and the object’s surface.

Most scanners perform best in controlled indoor lighting where the projected pattern remains clearly visible to the sensors.


Mesh Processing and Software Filtering

After scanning, software converts raw point cloud data into a mesh. During this process the software may apply smoothing, noise reduction, and hole filling.

These algorithms are designed to produce clean models but can unintentionally remove small features.

Many scanning applications include adjustable settings for mesh smoothing or detail preservation. Lower smoothing levels often retain more fine geometry.

Understanding these processing settings can significantly improve the final result.


Object Size vs Feature Size

Resolution specifications are also influenced by the overall size of the object being scanned.

Scanning a large object spreads the available point density across a wider area. This means fewer points represent small features.

In contrast, scanning a smaller object concentrates point density and improves feature capture.

For this reason, some scanners perform better when scanning smaller sections individually rather than attempting to capture a large object in one pass.


Calibration and Scanner Setup

Just like 3D printers, scanners require proper calibration.

Calibration ensures that cameras, sensors, and projection systems align correctly. If calibration drifts over time, accuracy can decrease.

Manufacturers typically provide calibration boards or routines. Running these periodically helps maintain optimal scanning performance.


Understanding Real-World Scanner Performance

In practice, the advertised resolution of a scanner represents the best-case scenario under ideal conditions.

Real-world scanning involves variables such as lighting, object surface properties, movement, and software processing. Each of these factors can reduce the amount of detail captured.

This does not mean the scanner is performing poorly. It simply reflects the difference between laboratory specifications and practical operation.


Improving Your Scan Results

While scanners cannot always achieve their theoretical limits, several techniques can significantly improve results.

Using matte scanning spray, maintaining the correct distance, scanning in stable lighting conditions, and adjusting mesh processing settings can all enhance detail capture.

Additionally, scanning smaller sections and combining them later often yields better results than scanning a large object all at once.

These practical adjustments often make the difference between an average scan and a highly detailed one.


Final Thoughts

The advertised resolution of a 3D scanner represents the maximum point density it can achieve under ideal conditions, not the guaranteed detail level in every scan.

Factors such as surface reflectivity, lighting, distance, motion, calibration, and software processing all influence the final result.

Once you understand these variables, scanning becomes far more predictable and far less frustrating.

With the right setup and expectations, modern 3D scanners are capable of producing highly detailed and accurate models suitable for reverse engineering, product design, and digital archiving.


Next Technical Guide

In the next guide, we will explore how to prepare scanned models for 3D printing, including mesh repair, hole filling, and converting scan data into usable CAD geometry.

Britforge3D
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.